Auditing the privacy leakage of synthetic data is an important but unresolved problem. Existing privacy auditing frameworks for synthetic data rely on heuristics and unrealistic assumptions about model access, offering limited ability to describe or detect the privacy exposure of training data through synthetic data release. In this paper, we study designing membership inference attacks (MIAs) that specifically exploit the observation that tabular generative models tend to significantly overfit to certain regions of the training distribution. We propose \emph{Generative Likelihood Ratio Attack} (Gen-LRA), a novel, computationally efficient No-Box MIA that, with no assumption of model knowledge or access, formulates its attack by evaluating the influence a test observation has on a surrogate model's estimate of a local likelihood ratio over the synthetic data. We develop a theoretical framework for the attack: we show that the Gen-LRA score admits a closed-form characterization as a localized density-ratio statistic, and we prove that under a general model of local overfitting it produces a provable mean-score gap between members and non-members, yielding testable predictions for when the attack should succeed. We validate these predictions in a controlled simulation study and assess Gen-LRA against a comprehensive benchmark spanning diverse datasets, generative model architectures, and attack parameters. Across metrics, Gen-LRA consistently dominates competing MIAs, with especially strong gains at low false positive rates. These results underscore Gen-LRA's effectiveness as a privacy auditing tool for the release of synthetic data, and highlight the significant privacy risks posed by generative model overfitting in real-world applications.