Classification models typically predict a score and use a decision threshold to produce a classification. Appropriate model evaluation should carefully consider the context in which a model will be used, including the relative value of correct classifications of positive versus negative examples, which affects the threshold that should be used. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and cost curves are model evaluation approaches that assess the expected utility and expected loss of prediction models, respectively, across decision thresholds. We compared DCA and cost curves to determine how they are related, and their strengths and limitations. We demonstrate that decision curves are closely related to a specific type of cost curve called a Brier curve. Both curves are derived assuming model scores are calibrated and setting the classification threshold using the relative value of correct positive and negative classifications, and the x-axis of both curves are equivalent. Net benefit (used for DCA) and Brier loss (used for Brier curves) will always choose the same model as optimal at any given threshold. Across thresholds, differences in Brier loss are comparable whereas differences in net benefit cannot be compared. Brier curves are more generally applicable (when a wider range of thresholds are plausible), and the area under the Brier curve is the Brier score. We demonstrate that reference lines common in each space can be included in either and suggest the upper envelope decision curve as a useful comparison for DCA showing the possible gain in net benefit that could be achieved through recalibration alone.