Machine learning models are vulnerable to biases that result in unfair treatment of individuals from different populations. Recent work that aims to test a model's fairness at the individual level either relies on domain knowledge to choose metrics, or on input transformations that risk generating out-of-domain samples. We describe a new approach for testing individual fairness that does not have either requirement. We propose a novel criterion for evaluating individual fairness and develop a practical testing method based on this criterion which we call fAux (pronounced fox). This is based on comparing the derivatives of the predictions of the model to be tested with those of an auxiliary model, which predicts the protected variable from the observed data. We show that the proposed method effectively identifies discrimination on both synthetic and real-world datasets, and has quantitative and qualitative advantages over contemporary methods.