Recently there has been a lot of interest in monitoring and identifying changes in dynamic networks, which has led to the development of a variety of monitoring methods. Unfortunately, these methods have not been systematically compared; moreover, new methods are often designed for a specialized use case. In light of this, we propose the use of simulation to compare the performance of network monitoring methods over a variety of dynamic network changes. Using our family of simulated dynamic networks, we compare the performance of several state-of-the-art social network monitoring methods in the literature. We compare their performance over a variety of types of change; we consider both increases in communication levels, node propensity change as well as changes in community structure. We show that there does not exist one method that is uniformly superior to the others; the best method depends on the context and the type of change one wishes to detect. As such, we conclude that a variety of methods is needed for network monitoring and that it is important to understand in which scenarios a given method is appropriate.