We study binary-action pairwise-separable graphical games that encompass both coordination and anti-coordination network games. Our model is grounded in an underlying directed signed graph, where each link is associated with a signed weight that describes both nature and the strength of the strategic pairwise interaction. Specifically, positive link weight corresponds to a strategic complement type interaction, whereas negative link weight corresponds to strategic substitute type interaction. The utility for each player is then an aggregation of pairwise terms determined by the weights of the signed graph in addition to an individual bias term. We consider a scenario that assumes the presence of a prominent cohesive subset of players, who are either connected exclusively by positive weights, or form a structurally balanced subset that can be bipartitioned into two adversarial subcommunities with positive intra-community and negative inter-community edges. Under suitable properties of the game restricted to the remaining players, our results guarantee the existence of Nash equilibria characterized by either consensus or polarization within the first group, as well as their stability under best response transitions. Our results can be interpreted as robustness results, building on the super-modular properties of network coordination games and on a novel use of the concept of graph cohesiveness.