Contact tracing has been extensively studied from different perspectives in recent years. However, there is no clear indication of why this intervention has proven effective in some epidemics (SARS) and mostly ineffective in some others (COVID-19). Here, we perform an exhaustive evaluation of random testing and contact tracing on novel superspreading random networks to try to identify which epidemics are more containable with such measures. We also explore the suitability of positive rates as a proxy of the actual infection statuses of the population. Moreover, we propose novel ideal strategies to explore the potential limits of both testing and tracing strategies. Our study counsels caution, both at assuming epidemic containment and at inferring the actual epidemic progress, with current testing or tracing strategies. However, it also brings a ray of light for the future, with the promise of the potential of novel testing strategies that can achieve great effectiveness.