惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - Franky
罗磊的独立博客
G
Google Developers Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
V
V2EX
F
Fortinet All Blogs
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
月光博客
月光博客
U
Unit 42
GbyAI
GbyAI
A
About on SuperTechFans
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
雷峰网
雷峰网
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
D
DataBreaches.Net
The Cloudflare Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Three-Stage Adjusted Regression Forecasting (TSARF) for S...
Shadow Pritchard, Bhaskar Mitra, Vidhyashree Nagaraju · 2024-01-31 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Software reliability growth models (SRGM) enable failure data collected during testing. Specifically, nonhomogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) SRGM are the most commonly employed models. While software reliability growth models are important, efficient modeling of complex software systems increases the complexity of models. Increased model complexity presents a challenge in identifying robust and computationally efficient algorithms to identify model parameters and reduces the generalizability of the models. Existing studies on traditional software reliability growth models suggest that NHPP models characterize defect data as a smooth continuous curve and fail to capture changes in the defect discovery process. Therefore, the model fits well under ideal conditions, but it is not adaptable and will only fit appropriately shaped data. Neural networks and other machine learning methods have been applied to greater effect [5], however limited due to lack of large samples of defect data especially at earlier stages of testing.