惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

小众软件
小众软件
博客园_首页
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
雷峰网
雷峰网
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 叶小钗
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
V
V2EX
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
H
Help Net Security
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
博客园 - 【当耐特】
V
Visual Studio Blog
月光博客
月光博客
G
Google Developers Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
腾讯CDC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
美团技术团队
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
GAPS: Targeted Execution of Android Apps via Static Path ...
[Submitted on 28 Nov 2025 (v1), last revised 17 Jul 2026 (this v · 2025-11-28 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Targeted execution of Android applications (apps) remains a longstanding challenge for software testing and analysis. Although recent advances in GUI testing have substantially improved app exploration, existing approaches remain largely coverage-driven and struggle to steer execution reliably toward specific methods of interest. This limitation hinders important downstream tasks, such as vulnerability detection, program comprehension, and dynamic analysis.
We present GAPS (Graph-based Automated Path Synthesizer), the first approach to bridge static program analysis and dynamic GUI exploration, enabling targeted execution in Android apps. Given a target method, GAPS performs a lightweight static backward traversal of the call graph, enriched with data-flow reasoning, to identify feasible execution paths that lead to the target. It then translates these paths into actionable execution strategies that guide dynamic interactions with the app.
We evaluate GAPS on the AndroTest benchmark and show that it reconstructs paths toward 88.24% of the target methods, requiring only 12.67 seconds per app on average. During dynamic execution, GAPS reaches 56.93% of the target methods, outperforming state-of-the-art alternatives. In comparison, the model-based GUI testing tool APE reaches only 11.12%, the hybrid exploration framework GoalExplorer reaches 4.75%, and the recent LLM-driven approach Guardian reaches 34%. To assess scalability in real-world settings, we further evaluate GAPS across the 50 most-downloaded apps on the Google Play Store. GAPS reconstructs execution paths toward 62.03% of the target methods, averaging 278.9 seconds per app, and dynamically reaches 54.80% of them. These results show that combining static path synthesis with guided dynamic exploration provides an effective and scalable solution for targeted method execution in Android apps.

Submission history

From: Samuele Doria [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:19:04 UTC (86 KB)
[v2] Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:39:37 UTC (60 KB)
[v3] Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:50:41 UTC (196 KB)