Recommender systems for software engineering (RSSEs) assist software engineers in dealing with a growing information overload when discerning alternative development solutions. While RSSEs are becoming more and more effective in suggesting handy recommendations, they tend to suffer from popularity bias, i.e., favoring items that are relevant mainly because several developers are using them. While this rewards artifacts that are likely more reliable and well-documented, it would also mean that missing artifacts are rarely used because they are very specific or more recent. This paper studies popularity bias in Third-Party Library (TPL) RSSEs. First, we investigate whether state-of-the-art research in RSSEs has already tackled the issue of popularity bias. Then, we quantitatively assess four existing TPL RSSEs, exploring their capability to deal with the recommendation of popular items. Finally, we propose a mechanism to defuse popularity bias in the recommendation list. The empirical study reveals that the issue of dealing with popularity in TPL RSSEs has not received adequate attention from the software engineering community. Among the surveyed work, only one starts investigating the issue, albeit getting a low prediction performance.