惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - Franky
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
D
DataBreaches.Net
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
I
InfoQ
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
爱范儿
爱范儿
D
Docker
美团技术团队
雷峰网
雷峰网
U
Unit 42
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Using Behavior Trees in Risk Assessment
Razan Ghzouli, Atieh Hanna, Endre Erös, Rebekka Wohlrab · 2025-06-11 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Cyber-physical production systems increasingly involve collaborative robotic missions, requiring more demand for robust and safe missions. Industries rely on risk assessments to identify potential failures and implement measures to mitigate their risks. Although it is recommended to conduct risk assessments early in the design of robotic missions, the state of practice in the industry is different. Safety experts often struggle to completely understand robotics missions at the early design stages of projects and to ensure that the output of risk assessments is adequately considered during implementation. This paper presents a design science study that conceived a model-based approach for early risk assessment in a development-centric way. Our approach supports risk assessment activities by using the behavior-tree model. We evaluated the approach together with five practitioners from four companies. Our findings highlight the potential of the behavior-tree model in supporting early identification, visualisation, and bridging the gap between code implementation and risk assessments' outputs. This approach is the first attempt to use the behavior-tree model to support risk assessment; thus, the findings highlight the need for further development.