惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
量子位
小众软件
小众软件
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
IT之家
IT之家
爱范儿
爱范儿
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The Cloudflare Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
V
V2EX
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Development and evaluation of an open-source, machine lea...
Zadid Khan, Sakib Mahmud Khan, Ph. D., Mashrur Chowdhury, Ph. D. · 2019-10-23 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Traditionally, Departments of Transportation (DOTs) use the factor-based model to estimate Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) from short-term traffic counts. The expansion factors, derived from the permanent traffic count stations, are applied to the short-term counts for AADT estimation. The inherent challenges of the factor-based method (i.e., grouping the count stations, applying proper expansion factors) make the estimated AADT values erroneous. Based on a survey conducted by the authors, 97% of the 39 public transportation agencies use the factor-based AADT estimation model, and these agencies face the aforementioned challenges while using factor-based models to estimate AADT. To derive a more accurate AADT, this paper presents the "estimAADTion" software, which is an open-source software developed based on a machine learning method called support vector regression (SVR) for estimating AADT using 24-hour short-term count data. DOTs conduct short-term counts at different locations periodically. This software has been designed to estimate AADT at a particular location from the short-term counts collected at those locations. In order to estimate AADT from short-term counts, the software uses data from permanent count stations to train the SVR model. The performance of the "estimAADTion" software is validated using the short-term count data from South Carolina. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of the AADT estimated from the software is 3%, while the factor-based method produces a MAPE value of 6%.