惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园_首页
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
量子位
A
About on SuperTechFans
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - 司徒正美
V
Visual Studio Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
腾讯CDC
Jina AI
Jina AI
C
Check Point Blog
H
Help Net Security
罗磊的独立博客
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
V
V2EX
爱范儿
爱范儿
I
InfoQ

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
A qos ontology-based component selection
Lamia Yessad, Zizette Boufaida · 2011-09-02 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

In the component-based software development, the selection step is very important. It consists of searching and selecting appropriate software components from a set of candidate components in order to satisfy the developer-specific requirements. In the selection process, both functional and non-functional requirements are generally considered. In this paper, we focus only on the QoS, a subset of non-functional characteristics, in order to determine the best components for selection. The component selection based on the QoS is a hard task due to the QoS descriptions heterogeneity. Thus, we propose a QoS ontology which provides a formal, a common and an explicit description of the software components QoS. We use this ontology in order to semantically select relevant components based on the QoS specified by the developer. Our selection process is performed in two steps: (1) a QoS matching process that uses the relations between QoS concepts to pre-select candidate components. Each candidate component is matched against the developer's request and (2) a component ranking process that uses the QoS values to determine the best components for selection from the pre-selected components. The algorithms of QoS matching and component ranking are then presented and experimented in the domain of multimedia components.