惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

U
Unit 42
罗磊的独立博客
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Jina AI
Jina AI
V
V2EX
美团技术团队
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
月光博客
月光博客
量子位
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
L
LangChain Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
D
DataBreaches.Net
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
B
Blog

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Supporting Design Decisions in Rule-Based Model Transform...
[Submitted on 8 Apr 2026] · 2026-06-19 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Authors:Dejan Stojimirovic (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia), Sinisa Neskovic (IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark)

View PDF

Abstract:Model Driven Engineering relies on model transformations to automate the derivation of target models or source code from source models. However, the design decisions that govern how source elements are mapped to target artifacts typically remain embedded in the transformation source code, limiting flexibility, reusability, and traceability. This paper proposes an approach to explicitly model and manage design decisions in rule-based model transformations. Design decisions are separated from transformation implementation through three mechanisms. First, a decision model captures design decisions and their options independently of any source modeling language for a given transformation domain. Second, a binding model connects these decisions to specific metamodel concepts in a given source modeling language, enabling reuse of the same design knowledge across transformations from similar languages. Third, a configuration model records the specific option chosen for each applicable source model element, with defaults pre-selected automatically. During execution, variability points in transformation rules are resolved dynamically according to configured choices. A trace model records which rules and options were applied to produce each target element. We establish a formal mathematical framework that defines the core concepts of variability-based transformations and proves key properties of the resulting transformations. The formal concepts are realized in a practical architecture of four interconnected artifact models. We demonstrate practical feasibility by extending an existing embedded domain-specific language for model-driven engineering with variability support and illustrate the approach with a complete ER-to-Relational transformation example.

Submission history

From: Dejan Stojimirović [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Apr 2026 15:00:40 UTC (683 KB)