惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
F
Fortinet All Blogs
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
B
Blog RSS Feed
小众软件
小众软件
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
V2EX
B
Blog
H
Help Net Security
D
Docker
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 司徒正美

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
StableShots: Online Shot Stopping for Quantum Circuit Exe...
[Submitted on 20 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-23 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Quantum circuit execution estimates output distributions by repeated measurements, yet developers commonly choose a fixed shot budget before execution. This static choice is brittle: low budgets can under-sample the distribution, while high budgets waste measurements. In this paper, we present StableShots, a black-box online stopping rule for static quantum circuits. The method executes a fixed circuit in small batches, monitors the total-variation distance between cumulative empirical distributions, and stops after repeated evidence of local stability. We evaluate StableShots on 180 QSimBench traces spanning six circuit families, six sizes from 4 to 14 qubits, and five noisy IBM simulated backends. With validation-only calibration and 100 repeated backend-holdout splits, the selected configuration reaches TVD <= 0.05 on all held-out test evaluations with median 7,650 shots, whereas fixed-shot baselines either fail more often or spend substantially more shots.

Submission history

From: Giuseppe Bisicchia [view email]
[v1] Sat, 20 Jun 2026 17:58:12 UTC (10 KB)