Modern software often struggles with bloat, leading to increased memory consumption and security vulnerabilities from unused code. In response, various program debloating techniques have been developed, typically utilizing test cases that represent functionalities users want to retain. These methods range from aggressive approaches, which prioritize maximal code reduction but may overfit to test cases and potentially reintroduce past security issues, to conservative strategies that aim to preserve all influenced code, often at the expense of less effective bloat reduction and security improvement. In this research, we present RLDebloatDU, an innovative debloating technique that employs 1-DU chain minimality within abstract syntax trees. Our approach maintains essential program data dependencies, striking a balance between aggressive code reduction and the preservation of program semantics. We evaluated RLDebloatDU on ten Linux kernel programs, comparing its performance with two leading debloating techniques: Chisel, known for its aggressive debloating approach, and Razor, recognized for its conservative strategy. RLDebloatDU significantly lowers the incidence of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) and improves soundness compared to both, highlighting its efficacy in reducing security issues without reintroducing resolved security issues.