惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

月光博客
月光博客
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园_首页
量子位
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
博客园 - Franky
G
Google Developers Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 【当耐特】
The Cloudflare Blog
H
Help Net Security
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
P
Proofpoint News Feed
C
Check Point Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Two-stage algorithms for covering array construction
Kaushik Sarkar, Charles J. Colbourn · 2016-06-21 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

Modern software systems often consist of many different components, each with a number of options. Although unit tests may reveal faulty options for individual components, functionally correct components may interact in unforeseen ways to cause a fault. Covering arrays are used to test for interactions among components systematically. A two-stage framework, providing a number of concrete algorithms, is developed for the efficient construction of covering arrays. %Our framework divides the construction in two stages. In the first stage, a time and memory efficient randomized algorithm covers most of the interactions. In the second stage, a more sophisticated search covers the remainder in relatively few tests. In this way, the storage limitations of the sophisticated search algorithms are avoided; hence the range of the number of components for which the algorithm can be applied is extended, without increasing the number of tests. Many of the framework instantiations can be tuned to optimize a memory-quality trade-off, so that fewer tests can be achieved using more memory. The algorithms developed outperform the currently best known methods when the number of components ranges from 20 to 60, the number of options for each ranges from 3 to 6, and $t$-way interactions are covered for $t\in \{5,6\}$. In some cases a reduction in the number of tests by more than $50\%$ is achieved.