惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

GbyAI
GbyAI
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
D
DataBreaches.Net
腾讯CDC
小众软件
小众软件
B
Blog RSS Feed
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
U
Unit 42
Y
Y Combinator Blog
V
V2EX
I
InfoQ
D
Docker
量子位
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
A
About on SuperTechFans
博客园 - 叶小钗
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
B
Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
PanicFI: An Infrastructure for Fixing Panic Bugs in Real-...
Yunbo Ni, Yang Feng, Zixi Liu, Runtao Chen, Baowen Xu · 2024-08-06 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

The Rust programming language has garnered significant attention due to its robust safety features and memory management capabilities. Despite its guaranteed memory safety, Rust programs suffer from runtime errors that are unmanageable, i.e., panic errors. Notably, traditional memory issues such as null pointer dereferences, which are prevalent in other languages, are less likely to be triggered in Rust due to its strict ownership rules. However, the unique nature of Rust's panic bugs, which arise from the language's stringent safety and ownership paradigms, presents a distinct challenge. Over half of the bugs in rustc, Rust's own compiler, are attributable to crash stemming from panic errors. However, addressing Rust panic bugs is challenging and requires significant effort, as existing fix patterns are not directly applicable due to the design and feature of Rust language.Therefore, developing foundational infrastructure, including datasets, fixing patterns, and automated repair tools, is both critical and urgent. This paper introduces a comprehensive infrastructure, namely PanicFI, aimed at providing supports for understanding Rust panic bugs and developing automated techniques. In PanicFI, we construct a dataset, Panic4R, comprising 102 real panic bugs and their fixes from the top 500 most-downloaded open-source crates.Then, through an analysis of the Rust compiler implementation , we identify Rust-specific patterns for fixing panic bugs, providing insights and guidance for generating patches. Moreover, we develop PanicKiller, the first automated tool for fixing Rust panic bugs, which has already contributed to the resolution of 28 panic bugs in open-source projects.The practicality and efficiency of PanicKiller confirm the effectiveness of the patterns mined within PanicFI.