惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
博客园 - Franky
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
量子位
博客园 - 聂微东
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
爱范儿
爱范儿
V
Visual Studio Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 叶小钗
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
U
Unit 42
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
小众软件
小众软件
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Y
Y Combinator Blog

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
PyExamine A Comprehensive, UnOpinionated Smell Detection ...
Karthik Shivashankar, Antonio Martini · 2025-01-30 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

The growth of Python adoption across diverse domains has led to increasingly complex codebases, presenting challenges in maintaining code quality. While numerous tools attempt to address these challenges, they often fall short in providing comprehensive analysis capabilities or fail to consider Python-specific contexts. PyExamine addresses these critical limitations through an approach to code smell detection that operates across multiple levels of analysis. PyExamine architecture enables detailed examination of code quality through three distinct but interconnected layers: architectural patterns, structural relationships, and code-level implementations. This approach allows for the detection and analysis of 49 distinct metrics, providing developers with an understanding of their codebase's health. The metrics span across all levels of code organization, from high-level architectural concerns to granular implementation details. Through evaluation on 7 diverse projects, PyExamine achieved detection accuracy rates: 91.4\% for code-level smells, 89.3\% for structural smells, and 80.6\% for architectural smells. These results were further validated through extensive user feedback and expert evaluations, confirming PyExamine's capability to identify potential issues across all levels of code organization with high recall accuracy. In additional to this, we have also used PyExamine to analysis the prevalence of different type of smells, across 183 diverse Python projects ranging from small utilities to large-scale enterprise applications. PyExamine's distinctive combination of comprehensive analysis, Python-specific detection, and high customizability makes it a valuable asset for both individual developers and large teams seeking to enhance their code quality practices.