惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园_首页
爱范儿
爱范儿
罗磊的独立博客
美团技术团队
Jina AI
Jina AI
量子位
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
V
V2EX
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
小众软件
小众软件
IT之家
IT之家
雷峰网
雷峰网
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 司徒正美
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
Understanding the Changing Landscape of Automotive Softwa...
Srijita Basu, Miroslaw Staron · 2025-03-22 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

The automotive industry has experienced a drastic transformation in the past few years when vehicles got connected to the internet. Nowadays, connected vehicles require complex architecture and interdependent functionalities, facilitating modern lifestyles and their needs. As a result, automotive software has shifted from just embedded system or SoC (System on Chip) to a more hybrid platform, which includes software for web or mobile applications, cloud, simulation, infotainment, etc. Automatically, the security concerns for automotive software have also developed accordingly. This paper presents a study on automotive vulnerabilities from 2018 to September 2024, i.e., the last seven years, intending to understand and report the noticeable changes in their pattern. 1,663 automotive software vulnerabilities were found to have been reported in the studied time frame. The study reveals the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) associated with these vulnerabilities develop over time and how different parts of the automotive ecosystem are exposed to these CWEs. Our study provides the platform to understand the automotive software weaknesses and loopholes and paves the way for identifying the phases in the software development lifecycle where the vulnerability was introduced. Our findings are a step forward to support vulnerability management in automotive software across its entire life cycle.