To quantify the impact of AI on software development, the community requires a robust pre-AI baseline. This study analyzes valid satisfaction data from 1,155 software developers collected in July 2022, immediately preceding the mainstream adoption of generative AI tools. We report a high-satisfaction ecosystem (Mean = 8.14 [95% CI 8.01-8.25]), dominated by Visual Studio Code (79% usage). Multivariable regression confirms that autonomy in tool choice is the strongest predictor of IDE satisfaction (beta = 0.51), significantly outweighing demographic or role-based factors. Conversely, cloud IDE adoption was negligible (4.3% regular usage), with 40.1% citing network dependency as the primary barrier, a constraint that remains relevant for modern cloud-reliant AI agents. Additionally, we identify an "experimenter" segment (29.9%) characterized by high tool churn but no significant satisfaction difference (t = 0.43, p = 0.67), and demonstrate significant variation in IDE retention rates (VS Code: 68.5%, traditional IDEs: 3.9-25%), suggesting underlying dissatisfaction despite high overall satisfaction. By providing a quantitative snapshot of developer sentiment and workflows on the eve of the AI revolution, this study establishes a verifiable baseline for longitudinal research into the productivity-satisfaction misalignment observed in the post-AI era.