惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
G
Google Developers Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - Franky
博客园_首页
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 聂微东
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
小众软件
小众软件
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Vercel News
Vercel News
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
爱范儿
爱范儿
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 叶小钗
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志

cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

VLA Foundry: A Unified Framework for Training Vision-Language-Action Models Evaluating LLM-Generated Obfuscated XSS Payloads for Machine Learning-Based Detection Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges Refute-or-Promote: An Adversarial Stage-Gated Multi-Agent Review Methodology for High-Precision LLM-Assisted Defect Discovery From Particles to Perils: SVGD-Based Hazardous Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Systems Testing Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph Human-Machine Co-Boosted Bug Report Identification with Mutualistic Neural Active Learning LLMSniffer: Detecting LLM-Generated Code via GraphCodeBERT and Supervised Contrastive Learning Neurosymbolic Repo-level Code Localization CodeMMR: Bridging Natural Language, Code, and Image for Unified Retrieval Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Verification Modulo Tested Library Contracts The Semi-Executable Stack: Agentic Software Engineering and the Expanding Scope of SE Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering: An Empirical Evaluation Relative to Expert Judgment From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap Vibe-Coding: Feedback-Based Automated Verification with no Human Code Inspection, a Feasibility Study Benchmarks for Trajectory Safety Evaluation and Diagnosis in OpenClaw and Codex: ATBench-Claw and ATBench-Codex Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution AIPC: Agent-Based Automation for AI Model Deployment with Qualcomm AI Runtime Analyzing Chain of Thought (CoT) Approaches in Control Flow Code Deobfuscation Tasks Asking What Matters: Reward-Driven Clarification for Software Engineering Tasks Prompt-Driven Code Summarization: A Systematic Literature Review LinuxArena: A Control Setting for AI Agents in Live Production Software Environments LLMs taking shortcuts in test generation: A study with SAP HANA and LevelDB Large Language Models to Enhance Business Process Modeling: Past, Present, and Future Trends CollabCoder: Plan-Code Co-Evolution via Collaborative Decision-Making for Efficient Code Generation Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can zero-shot learning (ZSL) go? Learning from Change: Predictive Models for Incident Prevention in a Regulated IT Environment
What Should Frontier AI Developers Disclose About Interna...
[Submitted on 24 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 1 Jul 2026 (this ve · 2026-04-25 · via cs.SE updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Frontier AI developers are increasingly deploying highly capable models internally to automate AI R&D, but these deployments currently face limited external oversight. It is essential, therefore, that developers provide evidence that internally deployed models are safe. While recent work has highlighted the risks of internal deployments and proposed broad approaches to transparency and governance, there remains little guidance on the specific information developers should disclose about them. We address this gap by identifying key information that companies should disclose about internally deployed models across four categories: capabilities, usage, safety mitigations, and governance. For each category, we analyse the key benefits and limitations of disclosure and consider how disclosure-related risks can be mitigated. Our framework could be used by developers to inform both public transparency documents, such as model system cards, and private periodic reports required under emerging frontier AI regulation.

Submission history

From: Raja Moreno [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Apr 2026 23:28:38 UTC (56 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 23:54:28 UTC (52 KB)