Data-driven joint-moment predictors offer a scalable alternative to laboratory-based inverse-dynamics pipelines for biomechanics estimation and exoskeleton control. Meanwhile, physics-based reinforcement learning (RL) enables simulation-trained controllers to learn dynamics-aware assistance strategies without extensive human experimentation. However, quantitative verification of simulation-trained exoskeleton torque predictors, and their impact on human joint power injection, remains limited. This paper presents (1) an RL framework to learn exoskeleton assistance policies that reduce biological joint moments, and (2) a validation pipeline that verifies the trained control networks using an open-source gait dataset through inference and comparison with biological joint moments. Simulation-trained multilayer perceptron (MLP) controllers are developed for level-ground and ramp walking, mapping short-horizon histories of bilateral hip and knee kinematics to normalized assistance torques. Results show that predicted assistance preserves task-intensity trends across speeds and inclines. Agreement is particularly strong at the hip, with cross-correlation coefficients reaching 0.94 at 1.8 m/s and 0.98 during 5° decline walking, demonstrating near-matched temporal structure. Discrepancies increase at higher speeds and steeper inclines, especially at the knee, and are more pronounced in joint power comparisons. Delay tuning biases assistance toward greater positive power injection; modest timing shifts increase positive power and improve agreement in specific gait intervals. Together, these results establish a quantitative validation framework for simulation-trained exoskeleton controllers, demonstrate strong sim-to-data consistency at the torque level, and highlight both the promise and the remaining challenges for sim-to-real transfer.