Safety-critical robot systems need thorough testing to expose design flaws and software bugs which could endanger humans. Testing in simulation is becoming increasingly popular, as it can be applied early in the development process and does not endanger any real-world operators. However, not all safety-critical flaws become immediately observable in simulation. Some may only become observable under certain critical conditions. If these conditions are not covered, safety flaws may remain undetected. Creating critical tests is therefore crucial. In recent years, there has been a trend towards using Reinforcement Learning (RL) for this purpose. Guided by domain-specific reward functions, RL algorithms are used to learn critical test strategies. This paper presents a case study in which the collision avoidance behavior of a mobile robot is subjected to RL-based testing. The study confirms prior research which shows that RL can be an effective testing tool. However, the study also highlights certain challenges associated with RL-based testing, namely (i) a possible lack of diversity in test conditions and (ii) the phenomenon of reward hacking where the RL agent behaves in undesired ways due to a misalignment of reward and test specification. The challenges are illustrated with data and examples from the experiments, and possible mitigation strategies are discussed.