Exoskeletons modulate human movement across diverse applications, from performance augmentation to daily-life assistance. These systems often enforce specific kinematic patterns to mitigate injury risks and motivate users to keep moving despite diminished capacity. However, little is known about users' perception of such robot-imposed guidance, especially when personalized to the uniqueness of individual human walk. Given the usually substantial computational cost for personalization, understanding its subjective impact is essential to justify its implementation over standard patterns. Ten unimpaired participants completed a within-subject experiment in a multi-planar treadmill-based exoskeleton that enforced three different gait patterns: personalized, standard, and a randomly selected pattern from a publicly available database. Personalization was achieved using a data-driven framework that predicts hip, knee, and pelvis trajectories from walking speed, anthropometric, and demographic data. The standard pattern was obtained by averaging gait patterns from the aforementioned database. After each condition, participants rated enjoyment, comfort, and perceived naturalness. Knee joint interaction forces were also recorded. Subjective ratings revealed no significant differences among patterns, despite all trajectories being executed with high accuracy. However, gait patterns experienced last were rated as significantly more comfortable and natural, indicating adaptation to the system. Higher interaction forces were observed only for the random vs. standard pattern. Personalizing gait kinematics had minimal short-term influence on user experience relative to the dominant effect of adaptation to the exoskeleton. These findings highlight the importance of integrating subjective feedback and accounting for user adaptation when designing personalized robot controllers.