Quality-Diversity (QD) algorithms evolve behaviourally diverse and high-performing solutions. To illuminate the elite solutions for a space of behaviours, QD algorithms require the definition of a suitable behaviour space. If the behaviour space is high-dimensional, a suitable dimensionality reduction technique is required to maintain a limited number of behavioural niches. While current methodologies for automated behaviour spaces focus on changing the geometry or on unsupervised learning, there remains a need for customising behavioural diversity to a particular meta-objective specified by the end-user. In the newly emerging framework of QD Meta-Evolution, or QD-Meta for short, one evolves a population of QD algorithms, each with different algorithmic and representational characteristics, to optimise the algorithms and their resulting archives to a user-defined meta-objective. Despite promising results compared to traditional QD algorithms, QD-Meta has yet to be compared to state-of-the-art behaviour space automation methods such as Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations Multi-dimensional Archive of Phenotypic Elites Algorithm (CVT-MAP-Elites) and Autonomous Robots Realising their Abilities (AURORA). This paper performs an empirical study of QD-Meta on function optimisation and multilegged robot locomotion benchmarks. Results demonstrate that QD-Meta archives provide improved average performance and faster adaptation to a priori unknown changes to the environment when compared to CVT-MAP-Elites and AURORA. A qualitative analysis shows how the resulting archives are tailored to the meta-objectives provided by the end-user.