惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 【当耐特】
罗磊的独立博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
I
InfoQ
B
Blog RSS Feed
腾讯CDC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
GbyAI
GbyAI
雷峰网
雷峰网
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
D
DataBreaches.Net
The Cloudflare Blog
V
V2EX
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Sequential Checking: Reallocation-Free Data-Distribution ...
Ken-ichiro Ishikawa · 2017-07-04 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Using tape or optical devices for scale-out storage is one option for storing a vast amount of data. However, it is impossible or almost impossible to rewrite data with such devices. Thus, scale-out storage using such devices cannot use standard data-distribution algorithms because they rewrite data for moving between servers constituting the scale-out storage when the server configuration is changed. Although using rewritable devices for scale-out storage, when server capacity is huge, rewriting data is very hard when server constitution is changed. In this paper, a data-distribution algorithm called Sequential Checking is proposed, which can be used for scale-out storage composed of devices that are hardly able to rewrite data. Sequential Checking 1) does not need to move data between servers when the server configuration is changed, 2) distribute data, the amount of which depends on the server's volume, 3) select a unique server when datum is written, and 4) select servers when datum is read (there are few such server(s) in most cases) and find out a unique server that stores the newest datum from them. These basic characteristics were confirmed through proofs and simulations. Data can be read by accessing 1.98 servers on average from a storage comprising 256 servers under a realistic condition. And it is confirmed by evaluations in real environment that access time is acceptable. Sequential Checking makes selecting scale-out storage using tape or optical devices or using huge capacity servers realistic.