Asynchronous Many-task (AMT) runtime systems have gained increasing acceptance in the HPC community due to the performance improvements offered by fine-grained tasking runtime systems. At the same time, C++ standardization efforts are focused on creating higher-level interfaces able to replace OpenMP or OpenACC in modern C++ codes. These higher level functions have been adopted in standards conforming runtime systems such as HPX, giving users the ability to simply utilize fork-join parallelism in their own codes. Despite innovations in runtime systems and standardization efforts users face enormous challenges porting legacy applications. Not only must users port their own codes, but often users rely on highly optimized libraries such as BLAS and LAPACK which use OpenMP for parallization. Current efforts to create smooth migration paths have struggled with these challenges, especially as the threading systems of AMT libraries often compete with the treading system of OpenMP. To overcome these issues, our team has developed hpxMP, an implementation of the OpenMP standard, which utilizes the underlying AMT system to schedule and manage tasks. This approach leverages the C++ interfaces exposed by HPX and allows users to execute their applications on an AMT system without changing their code. In this work, we compare hpxMP with Clang's OpenMP library with four linear algebra benchmarks of the Blaze C++ library. While hpxMP is often not able to reach the same performance, we demonstrate viability for providing a smooth migration for applications but have to be extended to benefit from a more general task based programming model.