惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园_首页
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
月光博客
月光博客
D
DataBreaches.Net
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园 - 叶小钗
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
U
Unit 42
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
C
Check Point Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
B
Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Vercel News
Vercel News
罗磊的独立博客
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
PCRAFT: Capacity Planning for Dependable Stateless Services
Rasha Faqeh, Andrè Martin, Valerio Schiavoni, Pramod Bhatotia, P · 2022-06-15 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Fault-tolerance techniques depend on replication to enhance availability, albeit at the cost of increased infrastructure costs. This results in a fundamental trade-off: Fault-tolerant services must satisfy given availability and performance constraints while minimising the number of replicated resources. These constraints pose capacity planning challenges for the service operators to minimise replication costs without negatively impacting availability. To this end, we present PCRAFT, a system to enable capacity planning of dependable services. PCRAFT's capacity planning is based on a hybrid approach that combines empirical performance measurements with probabilistic modelling of availability based on fault injection. In particular, we integrate traditional service-level availability mechanisms (active route anywhere and passive failover) and deployment schemes (cloud and on-premises) to quantify the number of nodes needed to satisfy the given availability and performance constraints. Our evaluation based on real-world applications shows that cloud deployment requires fewer nodes than on-premises deployments. Additionally, when considering on-premises deployments, we show how passive failover requires fewer nodes than active route anywhere. Furthermore, our evaluation quantify the quality enhancement given by additional integrity mechanisms and how this affects the number of nodes needed.