The size of collections, maps, and data structures in general, constitutes a fundamental property. An implementation of the size method is required in most programming environments. Nevertheless, in a concurrent environment, integrating a linearizable concurrent size introduces a noticeable overhead on all operations of the data structure, even when the size method is not invoked during the execution. In this work we present a study of synchronization methods in an attempt to improve the performance of the data structure. In particular, we study a handshake technique that is commonly used with concurrent garbage collection, an optimistic technique, and a lock-based technique. Evaluation against the state-of-the-art size methodology demonstrates that the overhead can be significantly reduced by selecting the appropriate synchronization approach, but there is no one-size-fits-all method. Different scenarios call for different synchronization methods, as rigorously shown in this study. Nevertheless, our findings align with general trends in concurrent computing. In scenarios characterized by low contention, optimistic and lock-based approaches work best, whereas under high contention, the most effective solutions are the handshake approach and the wait-free approach.