惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
雷峰网
雷峰网
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - Franky
腾讯CDC
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
V
V2EX
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
量子位
Jina AI
Jina AI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 叶小钗
D
Docker
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
PaSE: Parallelization Strategies for Efficient DNN Training
Venmugil Elango · 2024-07-04 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Training a deep neural network (DNN) requires substantial computational and memory requirements. It is common to use multiple devices to train a DNN to reduce the overall training time. There are several choices to parallelize each layer in a DNN. Exhaustively searching this list to find an optimal parallelization strategy is prohibitively time consuming and impractical. The standard practice is to use data parallelism because of its simplicity. However, data parallelism is often sub-optimal, and suffers from poor performance and high memory requirement. Expert-designed strategies have been proposed on a case-by-case basis using domain specific knowledge. These expert-designed strategies do not generalize well to DNNs other than the ones for which they were designed, and are not always necessarily the best choice. In this paper, we propose an approach to automatically find efficient parallelization strategies for DNNs from their computation graphs. We present an efficient algorithm to compute these strategies within a reasonable time in practice. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on various DNNs. We also compare the performance of the strategies identified by our approach against data parallelism, expert-designed strategies, and the state-of-the-art approaches. Our results show that the strategies found using our approach outperform the baseline data parallelism strategy in all the cases. In addition, our strategies achieve better performance than the expert-designed strategies and the state-of-the-art approaches.