惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
I
InfoQ
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
D
DataBreaches.Net
L
LangChain Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
GbyAI
GbyAI
爱范儿
爱范儿
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
腾讯CDC
美团技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
雷峰网
雷峰网
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
Docker
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 叶小钗

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
SwiftAgg: Communication-Efficient and Dropout-Resistant S...
Tayyebeh Jahani-Nezhad, Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali, Songze Li, Gius · 2022-02-09 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

We propose SwiftAgg, a novel secure aggregation protocol for federated learning systems, where a central server aggregates local models of $N$ distributed users, each of size $L$, trained on their local data, in a privacy-preserving manner. Compared with state-of-the-art secure aggregation protocols, SwiftAgg significantly reduces the communication overheads without any compromise on security. Specifically, in presence of at most $D$ dropout users, SwiftAgg achieves a users-to-server communication load of $(T+1)L$ and a users-to-users communication load of up to $(N-1)(T+D+1)L$, with a worst-case information-theoretic security guarantee, against any subset of up to $T$ semi-honest users who may also collude with the curious server. The key idea of SwiftAgg is to partition the users into groups of size $D+T+1$, then in the first phase, secret sharing and aggregation of the individual models are performed within each group, and then in the second phase, model aggregation is performed on $D+T+1$ sequences of users across the groups. If a user in a sequence drops out in the second phase, the rest of the sequence remain silent. This design allows only a subset of users to communicate with each other, and only the users in a single group to directly communicate with the server, eliminating the requirements of 1) all-to-all communication network across users; and 2) all users communicating with the server, for other secure aggregation protocols. This helps to substantially slash the communication costs of the system.