We study the psync complexity of concurrent sets in the non-volatile shared memory model. Flush instructions are used in non-volatile memory to force shared state to be written back to non-volatile memory and must typically be accompanied by the use of expensive fence instructions to enforce ordering among such flushes. Collectively we refer to a flush and a fence as a psync. The safety property of strict linearizability forces crashed operations to take effect before the crash or not take effect at all; the weaker property of durable linearizability enforces this requirement only for operations that have completed prior to the crash event. We consider lock-free implementations of list-based sets and prove two lower bounds. We prove that for any durable linearizable lock-free set there must exist an execution where some process must perform at least one redundant psync as part of an update operation. We introduce an extension to strict linearizability specialized for persistent sets that we call strict limited effect (SLE) linearizability. SLE linearizability explicitly ensures that operations do not take effect after a crash which better reflects the original intentions of strict linearizability. We show that it is impossible to implement SLE linearizable lock-free sets in which read-only (or search) operations do not flush or fence. We undertake an empirical study of persistent sets that examines various algorithmic design techniques and the impact of flush instructions in practice. We present concurrent set algorithms that provide matching upper bounds and rigorously evaluate them against existing persistent sets to expose the impact of algorithmic design and safety properties on psync complexity in practice as well as the cost of recovering the data structure following a system crash.