惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
L
LangChain Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
罗磊的独立博客
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - 叶小钗
I
InfoQ
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
H
Help Net Security
月光博客
月光博客
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
D
DataBreaches.Net
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
GbyAI
GbyAI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
博客园 - Franky

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Non-Clairvoyant Batch Sets Scheduling: Fairness is Fair e...
Julien Robert, Nicolas Schabanel · 2006-12-19 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Scheduling questions arise naturally in many different areas among which operating system design, compiling,... In real life systems, the characteristics of the jobs (such as release time and processing time) are usually unknown and unpredictable beforehand. The system is typically unaware of the remaining work in each job or of the ability of the job to take advantage of more resources. Following these observations, we adopt the job model by Edmonds et al (2000, 2003) in which the jobs go through a sequence of different phases. Each phase consists of a certain quantity of work and a speed-up function that models how it takes advantage of the number of processors it receives. We consider the non-clairvoyant online setting where a collection of jobs arrives at time 0. We consider the metrics setflowtime introduced by Robert et al (2007). The goal is to minimize the sum of the completion time of the sets, where a set is completed when all of its jobs are done. If the input consists of a single set of jobs, this is simply the makespan of the jobs; and if the input consists of a collection of singleton sets, it is simply the flowtime of the jobs. We show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUIoEQUI that evenly splits the available processors among the still unserved sets and then evenly splits these processors among the still uncompleted jobs of each unserved set, achieves a competitive ratio (2+\sqrt3+o(1))\frac{ln n}{lnln n} for the setflowtime minimization and that this is asymptotically optimal (up to a constant factor), where n is the size of the largest set. For makespan minimization, we show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUI achieves a competitive ratio of (1+o(1))\frac{ln n}{lnln n}, which is again asymptotically optimal.