惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
F
Fortinet All Blogs
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
B
Blog RSS Feed
小众软件
小众软件
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
V2EX
B
Blog
H
Help Net Security
D
Docker
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
罗磊的独立博客
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 司徒正美

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
ASURA: Scalable and Uniform Data Distribution Algorithm f...
Ken-ichiro Ishikawa · 2013-09-30 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Large-scale storage cluster systems need to manage a vast amount of data locations. A naive data locations management maintains pairs of data ID and nodes storing the data in tables. However, it is not practical when the number of pairs is too large. To solve this problem, management using data distribution algorithms, rather than management using tables, has been proposed in recent research. It can distribute data by determining the node for storing the data based on the datum ID. Such data distribution algorithms require the ability to handle the addition or removal of nodes, short calculation time and uniform data distribution in the capacity of each node. This paper proposes a data distribution algorithm called ASURA (Advanced Scalable and Uniform storage by Random number Algorithm) that satisfies these requirements. It achieves following four characteristics: 1) minimum data movement to maintain data distribution according to node capacity when nodes are added or removed, even if data are replicated, 2) roughly sub-micro-seconds calculation time, 3) much lower than 1% maximum variability between nodes in data distribution, and 4) data distribution according to the capacity of each node. The evaluation results show that ASURA is qualitatively and quantitatively competitive against major data distribution algorithms such as Consistent Hashing, Weighted Rendezvous Hashing and Random Slicing. The comparison results show benefits of each algorithm; they show that ASURA has advantage in large scale-out storage clusters.