惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
U
Unit 42
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - 聂微东
小众软件
小众软件
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
罗磊的独立博客
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园_首页
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - 司徒正美
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
D
DataBreaches.Net
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
D
Docker
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Distributed Metadata with the AMGA Metadata Catalog
Nuno Santos, Birger Koblitz · 2006-04-19 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Catalog Services play a vital role on Data Grids by allowing users and applications to discover and locate the data needed. On large Data Grids, with hundreds of geographically distributed sites, centralized Catalog Services do not provide the required scalability, performance or fault-tolerance. In this article, we start by presenting and discussing the general requirements on Grid Catalogs of applications being developed by the EGEE user community. This provides the motivation for the second part of the article, where we present the replication and distribution mechanisms we have designed and implemented into the AMGA Metadata Catalog, which is part of the gLite software stack being developed for the EGEE project. Implementing these mechanisms in the catalog itself has the advantages of not requiring any special support from the relational database back-end, of being database independent, and of allowing tailoring the mechanisms to the specific requirements and characteristics of Metadata Catalogs.