惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
美团技术团队
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
H
Help Net Security
小众软件
小众软件
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - 聂微东
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - Franky
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
A
About on SuperTechFans
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
D
Docker
Vercel News
Vercel News
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
腾讯CDC
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Battery draining attacks against edge computing nodes in ...
Ryan Smith, Daniel Palin, Philokypros P. Ioulianou, Vassilios G. · 2020-02-01 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Many IoT devices, especially those deployed at the network edge have limited power resources. A number of attacks aim to exhaust these resources and drain the batteries of such edge nodes. In this work, we study the effects of a variety of battery draining attacks against edge nodes. Through simulation, we clarify the extent to which such attacks are able to increase the usage and hence waste the power resources of edge nodes. Specifically, we implement hello flooding, packet flooding, selective forwarding, rank attack, and versioning attack in ContikiOS and simulate them in the Cooja simulator, and measure and report a number of time and power resource usage metrics including CPU time, low power mode time, TX/RX time, and battery consumption. Besides, we test the stretch attack with three different batteries as an extreme scenario. Our extensive measurements enable us to compare the effectiveness of these attacks. Our results show that Versioning attack is the most severe attack in terms of draining the power resources of the network, followed by Packet Flooding and Hello Flood attacks. Furthermore, we confirm that Selective Forwarding and Rank attacks are not able to considerably increase the power resource usage in our scenarios. By quantifying the effects of these attacks, we demonstrate that under specific scenarios, Versioning attack can be three to four times as effective as Packet Flooding and Hello Flood attacks in wasting network resources, while Packet Flooding is generally comparable to Hello Flood in CPU and TX time usage increase but twice as powerful in draining device batteries.