惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

量子位
D
DataBreaches.Net
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
美团技术团队
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 叶小钗
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Y
Y Combinator Blog
U
Unit 42
P
Proofpoint News Feed
V
V2EX

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Efficient Wait-Free Linearizable Implementations of Appro...
Colette Johnen, Adnane Khattabi, Alessia Milani, Jennifer L. Wel · 2024-02-22 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

Relaxing the sequential specification of a shared object is a way to obtain an implementation with better performance compared to implementing the original specification. We apply this approach to the Counter object, under the assumption that the number of times the Counter is incremented in any execution is at most a known bound $m$. We consider the $k$-multiplicative-accurate Counter object, where each read operation returns an approximate value that is within a multiplicative factor $k$ of the accurate value. More specifically, a read is allowed to return an approximate value $x$ of the number $v$ of increments previously applied to the counter such that $v/k \le x \le vk$. We present three algorithms to implement this object in a wait-free linearizable manner in the shared memory model using read-write registers. All the algorithms have read operations whose worst-case step complexity improves exponentially on that for an exact $m$-bounded counter (which in turn improves exponentially on that for an exact unbounded counter). Two of the algorithms have read step complexity that is asymptotically optimal. The algorithms differ in their requirements on $k$, step complexity of the increment operation, and space complexity.