惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
小众软件
小众软件
博客园 - 【当耐特】
J
Java Code Geeks
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
A
About on SuperTechFans
H
Help Net Security
博客园_首页
P
Proofpoint News Feed
GbyAI
GbyAI
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
爱范儿
爱范儿
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
The Cloudflare Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Near-Optimal Stability for Distributed Transaction Proces...
Ramesh Adhikari, Costas Busch, Dariusz R. Kowalski · 2025-09-02 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

In blockchain sharding, $n$ processing nodes are divided into $s$ shards, and each shard processes transactions in parallel. A key challenge in such a system is to ensure system stability for any ``tractable'' pattern of generated transactions; this is modeled by an adversary generating transactions with a certain rate of at most $ρ$ and burstiness $b$. This model captures worst-case scenarios and even some attacks on transactions' processing, e.g., DoS. A stable system ensures bounded transaction queue sizes and bounded transaction latency. It is known that the absolute upper bound on the maximum injection rate for which any scheduler could guarantee bounded queues and latency of transactions is $\max\left\{ \frac{2}{k+1}, \frac{2}{ \left\lfloor\sqrt{2s}\right\rfloor}\right\}$, where $k$ is the maximum number of shards that each transaction accesses. Here, we first provide a single leader scheduler that guarantees stability under injection rate $ρ\leq \max\left\{ \frac{1}{16k}, \frac{1}{16\lceil \sqrt{s} \rceil}\right\}$. Moreover, we also give a distributed scheduler with multiple leaders that guarantees stability under injection rate $ρ\leq \frac{1}{16c_1 \log D \log s}\max\left\{ \frac{1}{k}, \frac{1}{\lceil \sqrt{s} \rceil} \right\}$, where $c_1$ is some positive constant and $D$ is the diameter of shard graph $G_s$. This bound is within a poly-log factor from the optimal injection rate, and significantly improves the best previous known result for the distributed setting by Adhikari et al., SPAA 2024.