惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

I
InfoQ
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
H
Help Net Security
J
Java Code Geeks
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
量子位
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
G
Google Developers Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
小众软件
小众软件
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
L
LangChain Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - Franky
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Efficient Generation of Mandelbrot Set using Message Pass...
Bhanuka Manesha Samarasekara Vitharana Gamage, Vishnu Monn Baska · 2020-07-02 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

With the increasing need for safer and reliable systems, Mandelbrot Set's use in the encryption world is evident to everyone. This document aims to provide an efficient method to generate this set using data parallelism. First Bernstein's conditions are used to ensure that the Data is parallelizable when generating the Mandelbrot Set. Then Amdhal's Law is used to calculate the theoretical speed up, to be used to compare three partition schemes. The three partition schemes discussed in this document are the Naïve Row Segmentation, the First Come First Served Row Segmentation and the Alternating Row Segmentation. The Message Parsing Interface (MPI) library in C is used for all of the communication. After testing all the implementation on MonARCH, the results demonstrate that the Naïve Row Segmentation approach did not perform as par. But the Alternating Row Segmentation approach performs better when the number of tasks are $< 16$, where as the First Come First Served approach performs better when the number of tasks is $\ge 16$.