We present an analysis of large-scale load balancing systems, where the processing time distribution of tasks depends on both the task and server types. Our study focuses on the asymptotic regime, where the number of servers and task types tend to infinity in proportion. In heterogeneous environments, commonly used load balancing policies such as Join Fastest Idle Queue and Join Fastest Shortest Queue exhibit poor performance and even shrink the stability region. Interestingly, prior to this work, finding a scalable policy with a provable performance guarantee in this setup remained an open question. To address this gap, we propose and analyze two asymptotically delay-optimal dynamic load balancing policies. The first policy efficiently reserves the processing capacity of each server for ``good" tasks and routes tasks using the vanilla Join Idle Queue policy. The second policy, called the speed-priority policy, significantly increases the likelihood of assigning tasks to the respective ``good" servers capable of processing them at high speeds. By leveraging a framework inspired by the graphon literature and employing the mean-field method and stochastic coupling arguments, we demonstrate that both policies achieve asymptotic zero queuing. Specifically, as the system scales, the probability of a typical task being assigned to an idle server approaches 1.