惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Vercel News
Vercel News
博客园 - 司徒正美
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
V
Visual Studio Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
小众软件
小众软件
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
美团技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 聂微东
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
罗磊的独立博客
The Cloudflare Blog
V
V2EX
月光博客
月光博客
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 【当耐特】
T
Tailwind CSS Blog

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Optimal epidemic dissemination
Hugues Mercier, Laurent Hayez, Miguel Matos · 2017-09-01 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

We consider the problem of reliable epidemic dissemination of a rumor in a fully connected network of~$n$ processes using push and pull operations. We revisit the random phone call model and show that it is possible to disseminate a rumor to all processes with high probability using $Θ(\ln n)$ rounds of communication and only $n+o(n)$ messages of size $b$, all of which are asymptotically optimal and achievable with pull and push-then-pull algorithms. This contradicts two highly-cited lower bounds of Karp et al. stating that any algorithm in the random phone call model running in $\mathcal{O}(\ln n)$ rounds with communication peers chosen uniformly at random requires at least $ω(n)$ messages to disseminate a rumor with high probability, and that any address-oblivious algorithm needs $Ω(n \ln \ln n)$ messages regardless of the number of communication rounds. The reason for this contradiction is that in the original work, processes do not have to share the rumor once the communication is established. However, it is implicitly assumed that they always do so in the proofs of their lower bounds, which, it turns out, is not optimal. Our algorithms are strikingly simple, address-oblivious, and robust against $εn$ adversarial failures and stochastic failures occurring with probability $δ$ for any $0 \leq \{ε,δ\} < 1$. Furthermore, they can handle multiple rumors of size $b \in ω(\ln n \ln \ln n)$ with $nb + o(nb)$ bits of communication per rumor.