惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

L
LangChain Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
罗磊的独立博客
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
博客园_首页
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 【当耐特】
雷峰网
雷峰网
D
DataBreaches.Net
B
Blog RSS Feed
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 聂微东
V
Visual Studio Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta

cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

DUAL-BLADE: Dual-Path NVMe-Direct KV-Cache Offloading for Edge LLM Inference Progressive Semantic Communication for Efficient Edge-Cloud Vision-Language Models Efficient, VRAM-Constrained xLM Inference on Clients Folding Tensor and Sequence Parallelism for Memory-Efficient Transformer Training & Inference DORA: A Scalable Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Model Training AMMA: A Multi-Chiplet Memory-Centric Architecture for Low-Latency 1M Context Attention Serving RaMP: Runtime-Aware Megakernel Polymorphism for Mixture-of-Experts Spark Policy Toolkit: Semantic Contracts and Scalable Execution for Policy Learning in Spark Internet of Everything in the 6G Era: Paradigms, Enablers, Potentials and Future Directions PolyKV: A Shared Asymmetrically-Compressed KV Cache Pool for Multi-Agent LLM Inference A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations ITAS: A Multi-Agent Architecture for LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring Latency and Cost of Multi-Agent Intelligent Tutoring at Scale TACO: Efficient Communication Compression of Intermediate Tensors for Scalable Tensor-Parallel LLM Training FreeScale: Distributed Training for Sequence Recommendation Models with Minimal Scaling Cost CommFuse: Hiding Tail Latency via Communication Decomposition and Fusion for Distributed LLM Training A Taxonomy and Resolution Strategy for Client-Level Disagreements in Federated Learning Usable Agent Discovery for Decentralized AI Systems Cloud to Edge: Benchmarking LLM Inference On Hardware-Accelerated Single-Board Computers Data-Free Contribution Estimation in Federated Learning using Gradient von Neumann Entropy Shard the Gradient, Scale the Model: Serverless Federated Aggregation via Gradient Partitioning Promoting Simple Agents: Ensemble Methods for Event-Log Prediction GraphLeap: Decoupling Graph Construction and Convolution for Vision GNN Acceleration on FPGA AGNT2: Autonomous Agent Economies on Interaction-Optimized Layer 2 Infrastructure FedSIR: Spectral Client Identification and Relabeling for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels Stream-CQSA: Avoiding Out-of-Memory in Attention Computation via Flexible Workload Scheduling A Delta-Aware Orchestration Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent Edge Computing Federated Learning over Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Infrastructure Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not? Sherpa.ai Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Entity Alignment without Intersection Disclosure for Noisy Identifiers
Collaborative Dispersion by Silent Robots
Barun Gorain, Partha Sarathi Mandal, Kaushik Mondal, Supantha Pa · 2022-02-11 · via cs.DC updates on arXiv.org

In the dispersion problem, a set of $k$ co-located mobile robots must relocate themselves in distinct nodes of an unknown network. The network is modeled as an anonymous graph $G=(V,E)$, where the nodes of the graph are not labeled. The edges incident to a node $v$ with degree $d$ are labeled with port numbers in the range $0,1, \cdots, d-1$ at $v$. The robots have unique ids in the range $[0,L]$, where $L \ge k$, and are initially placed at a source node $s$. Each robot knows only its own id but does not know the ids of the other robots or the values of $L,k$. The task of dispersion was traditionally achieved with the assumption of two types of communication abilities: (a) when some robots are at the same node, they can communicate by exchanging messages between them (b) any two robots in the network can exchange messages between them. In this paper, we ask whether this ability of communication among co-located robots is necessary to achieve dispersion. We show that even if the ability of communication is not available, the task of dispersion by a set of mobile robots can be achieved in a much weaker model where a robot at a node $v$ has the access of following very restricted information at the beginning of any round: (1) am I alone at $v$? (2) the number of robots at $v$ increased or decreased compare to the previous round? We propose a deterministic algorithm that achieves dispersion on any given graph $G=(V,E)$ in time $O\left( k\log L+k^2 \log Δ\right)$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of a node in $G$. Each robot uses $O(\log L+ \log Δ)$ additional memory. We also prove that the task of dispersion cannot be achieved by a set of mobile robots with $o(\log L + \log Δ)$ additional memory.