Process mining aims to comprehend and enhance business processes by analyzing event logs. Recently, object-centric process mining has gained traction by considering multiple objects interacting with each other in a process. This object-centric approach offers advantages over traditional methods by avoiding dimension reduction issues. However, in contrast to traditional process mining where a standard event log format was quickly agreed upon with XES providing a common platform for further research and industry, various object-centric logging formats have been proposed, each addressing specific challenges such as object relations or dynamic attribute changes. This makes that interoperability of object-centric algorithms remains a challenge, hindering reproducibility and generalizability in research. Additionally, the object-centric process storage paradigm aligns well with a wide range of object-oriented databases storing process data. This paper introduces a specifications framework from three perspectives originating from process mining (what should be analyzed), object-centric process modeling (how it should be modeled), and database storage (how it should be stored) perspectives in order to compare and evaluate object-centric log formats. By identifying commonalities and discrepancies among these formats, the study delves into unresolved issues and proposes potential solutions. Ultimately, this research contributes to advancing object-centric process mining by facilitating a deeper understanding of event log formats and promoting consistency and compatibility across methodologies.