惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Y
Y Combinator Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
月光博客
月光博客
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 司徒正美
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
The Cloudflare Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
爱范儿
爱范儿
U
Unit 42
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale

cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Block-Sphere Vector Quantization GroupAffect-4: A Multimodal Dataset of Four-Person Collaborative Interaction CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing TextAlign: Preference Alignment for Text Rendering with Hierarchical Rewards LogRouter: Adaptive Two-Level LLM Routing for Log Question Answering in Big Data Systems Agentic Cost-Aware Query Planning with Knowledge Distillation for Big Data Analytics Covariance Structure and Coordinate Heterogeneity Govern Binary Quantization of Contrastive Embeddings IVF-TQ: Calibration-Free Streaming Vector Search via a Codebook-Free Residual Layer Automatic Unsupervised Ensemble Outlier Model Selection--Extended Version A Generative AI Framework for Intelligent Utility Billing CO 2 Analytics and Sustainable Resource Optimisation Towards Foundation Models for Relational Databases with Language Models and Graph Neural Networks Gaussian Relational Graph Transformer Croissant Baker: Metadata Generation for Discoverable, Governable, and Reusable ML Datasets Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift A Horn extension of DL-Lite with NL data complexity 3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs Enabling AI-Native Mobility in 6G: A Real-World Dataset for Handover, Beam Management, and Timing Advance A CAP-like Trilemma for Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-bias, and Utility under Semantic Underdetermination EpiCastBench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Multivariate Epidemic Forecasting FERMI: Exploiting Relations for Membership Inference Against Tabular Diffusion Models Toward Multi-Database Query Reasoning for Text2Cypher Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects: From Passive Assertions to Active Knowledge HOME-KGQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Question Answering on Household Daily Activities Detect, Localize, and Explain: Interactive Hierarchical Log Anomaly Analytics with LLM Augmentation Open Ontologies: Tool-Augmented Ontology Engineering with Stable Matching Alignment Machine Learning-Based Pre-Test Risk Stratification for PCR-Confirmed Chlamydia Using Patient-Reported Data and Urine Biomarkers Reconciling Consistency-Based Diagnosis with Actual-Causality-Based Explanations PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation? Anatomy of a Query: W5H Dimensions and FAR Patterns for Text-to-SQL Evaluation Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives
Competitive Data-Structure Dynamization
Claire Mathieu, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Neal E. Young, Arman Yousefi · 2020-11-05 · via cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Data-structure dynamization is a general approach for making static data structures dynamic. It is used extensively in geometric settings and in the guise of so-called merge (or compaction) policies in big-data databases such as Google Bigtable and LevelDB (our focus). Previous theoretical work is based on worst-case analyses for uniform inputs -- insertions of one item at a time and constant read rate. In practice, merge policies must not only handle batch insertions and varying read/write ratios, they can take advantage of such non-uniformity to reduce cost on a per-input basis. To model this, we initiate the study of data-structure dynamization through the lens of competitive analysis, via two new online set-cover problems. For each, the input is a sequence of disjoint sets of weighted items. The sets are revealed one at a time. The algorithm must respond to each with a set cover that covers all items revealed so far. It obtains the cover incrementally from the previous cover by adding one or more sets and optionally removing existing sets. For each new set the algorithm incurs build cost equal to the weight of the items in the set. In the first problem the objective is to minimize total build cost plus total query cost, where the algorithm incurs a query cost at each time $t$ equal to the current cover size. In the second problem, the objective is to minimize the build cost while keeping the query cost from exceeding $k$ (a given parameter) at any time. We give deterministic online algorithms for both variants, with competitive ratios of $Θ(\log^* n)$ and $k$, respectively. The latter ratio is optimal for the second variant.