惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
U
Unit 42
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
H
Help Net Security
G
Google Developers Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
B
Blog RSS Feed
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - Franky
J
Java Code Geeks
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
D
DataBreaches.Net
C
Check Point Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
腾讯CDC
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
V
Visual Studio Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
GbyAI
GbyAI
The Cloudflare Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏

cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Block-Sphere Vector Quantization GroupAffect-4: A Multimodal Dataset of Four-Person Collaborative Interaction CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing TextAlign: Preference Alignment for Text Rendering with Hierarchical Rewards LogRouter: Adaptive Two-Level LLM Routing for Log Question Answering in Big Data Systems Agentic Cost-Aware Query Planning with Knowledge Distillation for Big Data Analytics Covariance Structure and Coordinate Heterogeneity Govern Binary Quantization of Contrastive Embeddings IVF-TQ: Calibration-Free Streaming Vector Search via a Codebook-Free Residual Layer Automatic Unsupervised Ensemble Outlier Model Selection--Extended Version A Generative AI Framework for Intelligent Utility Billing CO 2 Analytics and Sustainable Resource Optimisation Towards Foundation Models for Relational Databases with Language Models and Graph Neural Networks Gaussian Relational Graph Transformer Croissant Baker: Metadata Generation for Discoverable, Governable, and Reusable ML Datasets Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift A Horn extension of DL-Lite with NL data complexity 3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs Enabling AI-Native Mobility in 6G: A Real-World Dataset for Handover, Beam Management, and Timing Advance A CAP-like Trilemma for Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-bias, and Utility under Semantic Underdetermination EpiCastBench: Datasets and Benchmarks for Multivariate Epidemic Forecasting FERMI: Exploiting Relations for Membership Inference Against Tabular Diffusion Models Toward Multi-Database Query Reasoning for Text2Cypher Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects: From Passive Assertions to Active Knowledge HOME-KGQA: A Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Question Answering on Household Daily Activities Detect, Localize, and Explain: Interactive Hierarchical Log Anomaly Analytics with LLM Augmentation Open Ontologies: Tool-Augmented Ontology Engineering with Stable Matching Alignment Machine Learning-Based Pre-Test Risk Stratification for PCR-Confirmed Chlamydia Using Patient-Reported Data and Urine Biomarkers Reconciling Consistency-Based Diagnosis with Actual-Causality-Based Explanations PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation? Anatomy of a Query: W5H Dimensions and FAR Patterns for Text-to-SQL Evaluation Building informative materials datasets beyond targeted objectives
Automatic Metadata Extraction for Text-to-SQL
Vladislav Shkapenyuk, Divesh Srivastava, Theodore Johnson, Paris · 2025-05-26 · via cs.DB updates on arXiv.org

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently become sophisticated enough to automate many tasks ranging from pattern finding to writing assistance to code generation. In this paper, we examine text-to-SQL generation. We have observed from decades of experience that the most difficult part of query development lies in understanding the database contents. These experiences inform the direction of our research. Text-to-SQL benchmarks such as SPIDER and Bird contain extensive metadata that is generally not available in practice. Human-generated metadata requires the use of expensive Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), who are often not fully aware of many aspects of their databases. In this paper, we explore techniques for automatic metadata extraction to enable text-to-SQL generation. We explore the use of two standard and one newer metadata extraction techniques: profiling, query log analysis, and SQL-to text generation using an LLM. We use BIRD benchmark [JHQY+23] to evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques. BIRD does not provide query logs on their test database, so we prepared a submission that uses profiling alone, and does not use any specially tuned model (we used GPT-4o). From Sept 1 to Sept 23, 2024, and Nov 11 through Nov 23, 2024 we achieved the highest score both with and without using the "oracle" information provided with the question set. We regained the number 1 spot on Mar 11, 2025, and are still at #1 at the time of the writing (May, 2025).