In a large database system, upper-bounding the cardinality of a join query is a crucial task called $\textit{pessimistic cardinality estimation}$. Recently, Abo Khamis, Nakos, Olteanu, and Suciu unified related works into the following dexterous framework. Step 1: Let $(X_1, \dotsc, X_n)$ be a random row of the join, equating $H(X_1, \dotsc, X_n)$ to the log of the join cardinality. Step 2: Upper-bound $H(X_1, \dotsc, X_n)$ using Shannon-type inequalities such as $H(X, Y, Z) \le H(X) + H(Y|X) + H(Z|Y)$. Step 3: Upper-bound $H(X_i) + p H(X_j | X_i)$ using the $p$-norm of the degree sequence of the underlying graph of a relation. While old bound in step 3 count "claws $\in$" in the underlying graph, we proposed $\textit{ambidextrous}$ bounds that count "claw pairs ${\ni}\!{-}\!{\in}$". The new bounds are provably not looser and empirically tighter: they overestimate by $x^{3/4}$ times when the old bounds overestimate by $x$ times. An example is counting friend triples in the $\texttt{com-Youtube}$ dataset, the best dexterous bound is $1.2 \cdot 10^9$, the best ambidextrous bound is $5.1 \cdot 10^8$, and the actual cardinality is $1.8 \cdot 10^7$.