Authors:Yuchu Jiang, Jian Zhao, Yuchen Yuan, Tianle Zhang, Yao Huang, Yanghao Zhang, Yan Wang, Yanshu Li, Xizhong Guo, Yusheng Zhao, Huilin Zhou, Jun Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaojian Lin, Yixiu Zou, Haoxuan Ma, Yuhu Shang, Yuzhi Hu, Keshu Cai, Ruochen Zhang, Boyuan Chen, Yilan Gao, Ziheng Jiao, Yi Qin, Shuangjun Du, Xiao Tong, Zhekun Liu, Yu Chen, Xuankun Rong, Rui Wang, Yejie Zheng, Zhaoxin Fan, Murat Sensoy, Hongyuan Zhang, Pan Zhou, Lei Jin, Hao Zhao, Xu Yang, Jiaojiao Zhao, Jianshu Li, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Zhi-Qi Cheng, Longtao Huang, Zhiyi Liu, Zheng Zhu, Jianan Li, Gang Wang, Qi Li, Xu-Yao Zhang, Yaodong Yang, Mang Ye, Wenqi Ren, Zhaofeng He, Hang Su, Rongrong Ni, Liping Jing, Xingxing Wei, Junliang Xing, Massimo Alioto, Shengmei Shen, Petia Radeva, Dacheng Tao, Ya-Qin Zhang, Shuicheng Yan, Xuelong Li
Abstract:The rapid advancement of AI has expanded its capabilities across domains, yet introduced critical technical vulnerabilities, such as algorithmic bias and adversarial sensitivity, that pose significant societal risks, including misinformation, inequity, security breaches, physical harm, and eroded public trust. These challenges highlight the urgent need for robust AI governance. We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security (system reliability), Derivative Security (real-world harm mitigation), and Social Ethics (value alignment and accountability). Uniquely, our approach unifies technical methods, emerging evaluation benchmarks, and policy insights to promote transparency, accountability, and trust in AI systems. Through a systematic review of over 300 studies, we identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight. These shortcomings stem from treating governance as an afterthought, rather than a foundational design principle, resulting in reactive, siloed efforts that fail to address the interdependence of technical integrity and societal trust. To overcome this, we present an integrated research agenda that bridges technical rigor with social responsibility. Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy. The accompanying repository is available at this https URL.
From: Yuchu Jiang [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:42:56 UTC (1,077 KB)
[v2]
Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:24:57 UTC (1,077 KB)
[v3]
Thu, 14 Aug 2025 04:06:14 UTC (1,077 KB)
[v4]
Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:25:19 UTC (1,086 KB)
[v5]
Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:42:47 UTC (576 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。