惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
罗磊的独立博客
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
G
Google Developers Blog
V
V2EX
D
Docker
博客园_首页
The Cloudflare Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Y
Y Combinator Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
J
Java Code Geeks
L
LangChain Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - 【当耐特】
小众软件
小众软件
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
P
Proofpoint News Feed
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园 - Franky

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Utilizing Pr...
Sarah Cline, Jacob Aronoff · 2019-12-15 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

As people across the world become increasingly aware of how their privacy is compromised in this digital era, the field of Privacy Enhancing Technologies, or PETs, has boomed. The first workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technology was in 2000, then called the "Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability." By 2007, the workshop had ballooned into a full symposium. In 2015, the first issue of the Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies journal was published. This year in 2019, there were 4 volumes of Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies published, containing a total of 66 papers. Of these papers, we identified 14 which specifically describe PETs that have been newly developed or utilized in a new way. We focused on 3 papers that seemed to have widespread use cases. Some of these use cases, however, include criminal activity. While heavily focused on adversarial actions and capability, much of security research does not focus on or consider the social science and motivations behind bad actors. We believe that this is a critical factor to consider when working on the problem of cybercrime. In this paper, we will analyze some of the cutting edge PETs and the potential risks associated with them from the lenses of computer science and criminal justice. We argue that the continued development of privacy enhancing technology contributes to the global rise of cybercrime.