In training their newly-developed malware detection methods, researchers rely on threshold-based labeling strategies that interpret the scan reports provided by online platforms, such as VirusTotal. The dynamicity of this platform renders those labeling strategies unsustainable over prolonged periods, which leads to inaccurate labels. Using inaccurately labeled apps to train and evaluate malware detection methods significantly undermines the reliability of their results, leading to either dismissing otherwise promising detection approaches or adopting intrinsically inadequate ones. The infeasibility of generating accurate labels via manual analysis and the lack of reliable alternatives force researchers to utilize VirusTotal to label apps. In the paper, we tackle this issue in two manners. Firstly, we reveal the aspects of VirusTotal's dynamicity and how they impact threshold-based labeling strategies and provide actionable insights on how to use these labeling strategies given VirusTotal's dynamicity reliably. Secondly, we motivate the implementation of alternative platforms by (a) identifying VirusTotal limitations that such platforms should avoid, and (b) proposing an architecture of how such platforms can be constructed to mitigate VirusTotal's limitations.