惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
量子位
H
Help Net Security
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
小众软件
小众软件
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Vercel News
Vercel News
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园_首页
V
Visual Studio Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
L
LangChain Blog
V
V2EX

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Agentic Vulnerability Reasoning on Windows COM Binaries From Beats to Breaches:How Offensive AI Infers Sensitive User Information from Playlists Undetectable Backdoors in Model Parameters: Hiding Sparse Secrets in High Dimensions When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems Token-Efficient Change Detection in LLM APIs Selfie-Capture Dynamics as an Auxiliary Signal Against Deepfakes and Injection Attacks for Mobile Identity Verification Trident: Improving Malware Detection with LLMs and Behavioral Features When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents RefusalGuard: Geometry-Preserving Fine-Tuning for Safety in LLMs Checkerboard: A Simple, Effective, Efficient and Learning-free Clean Label Backdoor Attack with Low Poisoning Budget Block-wise Codeword Embedding for Reliable Multi-bit Text Watermarking Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors Enhancing Linux Privilege Escalation Attack Capabilities of Local LLM Agents Defusing the Trigger: Plug-and-Play Defense for Backdoored LLMs via Tail-Risk Intrinsic Geometric Smoothing Evaluating Jailbreaking Vulnerabilities in LLMs Deployed as Assistants for Smart Grid Operations: A Benchmark Against NERC Standards Behavioral Canaries: Auditing Private Retrieved Context Usage in RL Fine-Tuning FlexServe: A Fast and Secure LLM Serving System for Mobile Devices with Flexible Resource Isolation Breaking MCP with Function Hijacking Attacks: Novel Threats for Function Calling and Agentic Models Text Steganography with Dynamic Codebook and Multimodal Large Language Model An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data TwoHamsters: Benchmarking Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety in Text-to-Image Models Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy-Utility Guarantees for DP-SGD Symbolic Guardrails for Domain-Specific Agents: Stronger Safety and Security Guarantees Without Sacrificing Utility Hardening x402: PII-Safe Agentic Payments via Pre-Execution Metadata Filtering QShield: Securing Neural Networks Against Adversarial Attacks using Quantum Circuits Hijacking Text Heritage: Hiding the Human Signature through Homoglyphic Substitution Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit Private Seeds, Public LLMs: Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation One Word at a Time: Incremental Completion Decomposition Breaks LLM Safety Measuring and Exploiting Contextual Bias in LLM-Assisted Security Code Review
Entanglement-based Mutual Quantum Distance Bounding
Aysajan Abidin, Karim Eldefrawy, Dave Singelee · 2023-05-17 · via cs.CR updates on arXiv.org

Mutual distance bounding (DB) protocols enable two distrusting parties to establish an upper-bound on the distance between them. DB has been so far mainly considered in classical settings and for classical applications, especially in wireless settings, e.g., to prevent relay attacks in wireless authentication and access control systems, and for secure localization. While recent research has started exploring DB in quantum settings, all current quantum DB (QDB) protocols employ quantum-bits (qubits) in the rapid-bit exchange phase and only perform one-way DB. Specifically, the latest QDB proposals improve the initial ones by adding resistance to photon number splitting attacks, and improving round complexity by avoiding communication from the prover to the verifier in the last authentication phase. This paper presents two new QDB protocols that differ from previously proposed protocols in several aspects: (1) to the best of our knowledge, our protocols are the first to utilize entangled qubits in the rapid-bit exchange phase, previous protocols relied on sending individual qubits, not those from a pair of entangled ones; (2) our second protocol can perform mutual QDB between two parties in one execution, previous QDB protocols had to be executed twice with the prover and verifier roles reversed in each execution; (3) the use of entangled qubits in our protocols thwarts attacks that previous QDB protocols were prone to; (4) and finally, our protocols also eliminate the need for communication from the prover to the verifier in the last authentication phase, which was necessary in some previous QDB protocols. Our work paves the way for several interesting research directions which we briefly discuss in detail in the appendix.